RESUMO
Objective: Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecological condition, often causing gastrointestinal symptoms and misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Endometriosis guidelines do not formally endorse dietary changes and little is known about how they are self-managed. The objective of this study is to understand nutritional practices and management of gut symptoms in people with endometriosis. Study design: Participants were recruited as part of a larger survey study via endometriosis support groups on social media. Eligibility criteria were: a self-reported physician-led diagnosis of endometriosis, over 18 years old and residing in the United Kingdom (UK). Semi-structured interviews were undertaken virtually via Zoom using a predefined interview guide. All interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: 10 people with endometriosis were interviewed. All had made individual dietary changes to manage their gut-related endometriosis symptoms. Dietary changes were made based on advice from social media support, books, websites or professionals other than dietitians. Changes included the restriction and exclusion of multiple essential food groups, including dairy, grains (primarily gluten), vegetables, fruits, and animal products. These changes impacted participants' weight, nutritional status and relationship with food. Four strong themes were identified: 1) impact of pain 2) severe and unpredictable gut symptoms 3) dietary changes and their impact 4) seeking support for dietetic intervention. A common thread underlying and linking these four main themes was the feeling of being dismissed, care being delayed and lack of support. Overall the long delay waiting for a diagnosis, surgery and, at times, the re-occurrence of symptoms post-surgery led to unsupported trial and error with modifiable lifestyle factors, including diet. Conclusion: Overall, participants demonstrated some patterns of restrictive eating behaviour and wanted more professional support to help manage their endometriosis-related gut symptoms. This highlights the need for dietitians to be involved in endometriosis care to help alleviate gut symptoms, whilst ensuring nutritional adequacy and offering weight management support where required.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol in the management of late fetal death. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen. METHODS: A consecutive series of 96 women with intrauterine death after 24 weeks of gestation were studied. Each woman received a single dose of 200 mg mifepristone orally, following which a 24-48 hour interval was recommended before administration of misoprostol. For gestations of 24-34 weeks, 200 microg of intravaginal misoprostol was administered, followed by four oral doses of 200 microg at three hourly intervals. Gestations over 34 weeks were given a similar regimen but a reduced dose of 100 microg misoprostol. RESULTS: The average induction to delivery interval was 8.5 hours. Ninety-five women (98.9%) were delivered within 72 hours of administration of first dose of misoprostol, with 66.7%, 87.5%, 92.7% and 95.8% women delivering within 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours, respectively. No significant correlation was found between mean induction to delivery interval and maternal age, parity, Bishop's score, birthweight and mifepristone/ misoprostol interval. The induction to delivery interval was shorter with increasing gestation (P = 0.04). Mild side effects were noted in eight (8.3%) women. Three (3.1%) women had treatment for presumed or proven pelvic sepsis. No cases of uterine tachysystole, haemorrhage or coagulopathy were recorded. CONCLUSION: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for induction of labour following late fetal death is an effective and safe regimen. The induction to delivery interval with this regimen appears shorter than studies using mifepristone or misoprostol.
